Seattle Traffic, DUI and Criminal Defense Attorney

Available 24/7 – (206) 729-3477
The Best in Traffic, DUI and Criminal Defense

The Seattle DUI and Criminal Defense Blog

Happy Holidays Bellevue Police

Posted Tuesday, December 11, 2012 by Andrew Charles Huff

So it seems like the place to raise some holiday cheer this year would be the Bellevue Police Department’s Holiday Party, including the famous “Pink Panty Droppers” cocktail made famous by the now infamous Bellevue Police Officers and crew. You have no doubt heard about this law enforcement party group being unceremoniously kicked out of a Seahawks game in September and then harassing a Seattle Police Officer, tossing around expletives along with some trash on the ground.Although the officers were disciplined and offered apologies for their behavior, the question in my mind is how does one truly enjoy a game after having consumed such a large quantity of pre-game refreshments, in this case a keg of beer, shots of whiskey and of course the infamous “Pink Panty Droppers,” a mixture surely to lead even the strictest code of conduct followers to places unknown.

Don’t get me wrong here. I went to a college over in Pullman known to have its’ share of beer bongs and tequila shots, or was it beer shots and tequila bongs? No matter since both were readily available. I was actually known for my famous tequila and eggs breakfast by my roommates. And yes I, or rather we attended many a football game there under the influence of much more than Cougar spirit. For what I can remember, every time game announcer Glen Johnson announced another “Cougar First Down,” we would all down a beer that we smuggled in, usually in places that should not be shared here.But I would simply offer those fellow officers the same advice I would give anyone. That is if you engage in pre-game cheer that pushes the limit similar to how Marshawn Lynch pushes for a first down, then avoid the men and women in blue. And if that is unavoidable, then at least offer to buy them a post-game drink.

Permalink to this entry

Legalize Marijuana? It's About Time.

Posted Tuesday, November 27, 2012 by Andrew Charles Huff

Voters in our state recently decided to legalize the possession and use of marijuana with restrictions, allowing the state to tax and regulate it. As a criminal defense attorney, my response’s about time. I say this for a number of reasons. First, my experience has shown me that very few crimes, if any, are the result of marijuana use, whether it be Driving Under the Influence, domestic violence, assault, etc. Alcohol and other drugs including prescription medication are the primary causes of drug-induced criminal behavior. I cannot tell you how many times assaults, whether they are bar fights or domestic situations, have been caused by alcohol. Marijuana-related crimes aside from simple possession or distribution just do not exist, with some limited exceptions, of course.

Law enforcement and prosecuting attorneys across the state have used so much of their limited resources jailing and prosecuting people guilty of simple possession of marijuana when their efforts are needed elsewhere. To their credit, many prosecutors are now dismissing simple possession charges in light of the new law. I suspect many are breathing a collective sigh of relief as well now that these cases are no longer taking up space in courtrooms.

Many are asking questions about how counties and cities should deal with people who choose to use marijuana legally and how it should be regulated. The answer is simple. Treat it just like alcohol. Parents should educate their kids about it in the same manner as they do alcohol. Government should assume the same role in educating the public about abuse as they do with alcohol, and of course the revenue derived from regulating and taxing marijuana should be the same as alcohol.
Prohibition, history has shown us, rarely has worked. And in the case of a plant already used by millions, legalization will not result in a run to the nearest head shop. The reason is people who want to use marijuana probably already are. Decriminalizing and regulating it like alcohol not only will relieve precious law and justice resources, but from a societal perspective simply makes sense.

Permalink to this entry

Campaign for Washington Attorney General STINKS

Posted Thursday, November 1, 2012 by Andrew Charles Huff

As a practicing criminal defense attorney, I have met the two candidates for Washington Attorney General a number of times over the years. Both Bob Ferguson and Reagan Dunn are intelligent, qualified and hard working attorneys who ironically are both members of the King County Council. Both bring different backgrounds and experiences to the current campaign for the state’s highest ranking attorney to succeed Rob McKenna. But if you have been following the campaign advertising, it simply stinks like rotten fish. Advertisements against both candidates have made claims of improper use of public funds, laziness on the job, protecting convicted criminals and (gasp) plea bargaining. These accusations are not only inaccurate, but unfairly portray each candidate in a false and deceiving light. Now, most of these ads are independent expenditures paid for by various groups not affiliated with each candidate. In other words, outside or 3rd party groups have paid for advertsising that have portrayed each candidate in a false and downright malicious light because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled they could…without any sort of spending limit. In this election, we have seen these independent ads air consistently against many different candidates. However, the Attorney General’s race has always been somewhat different in the past. I dare say that previous AG campaigns have been honorable, intelligent, respectful of the office. This year’s campaign has been anything but and has besmirched the office completely. I understand that both Dunn and Ferguson are unaffiliated with these ads and the groups supporting them. But there is nothing stopping each candidate from publicly disavowing these ads and requesting the supporting groups stop running them in our state. Otherwise, future campaigns for Attorney General will continue to wallow where this one is now…in the toilet. Gentlemen, you can do better.

Permalink to this entry

Artificially high breath tests...they do happen.

Posted Wednesday, October 24, 2012 by Andrew Charles Huff

As a Washington DUI and criminal defense attorney, I deal with breath tests for alcohol on an almost daily basis. In Washington, we currently use the BAC DataMaster Breath Test Machine, the only approved device for breath testing for alcohol admitted in our courts.But as with the DataMaster and other breath testing devices, the possibility of false positives or artificially high results are always present. In fact, I have represented numerous clients in my criminal defense practice who have submitted breath samples that were clearly artificially high and not an accurate measure of the person’s breath alcohol content. Although the DataMaster has some safeguards to prevent inflated results, they still happen and can be caused by a number of very common things. Here are some primary causes of inflated breath tests:

  1. Mouth Alcohol Decaying food particles trapped between the teeth or in dentures, braces, cavities or impactions can cause alcohol in the mouth. Also latent alcohol from cough syrup, cold medicine, homeopathic preparations, and mouthwash or various breath fresheners can also cause mouth alcohol. Medical issues such as acid reflux, belching and even heartburn or other improper digestion can also cause dramatically increased breath test results. In cases of heartburn, GERD (gastro esophageal reflux disease) or acid reflux, alcohol from the stomach can move to the throat or mouth. When you blow into the breath test machine, the mouth alcohol plus the air in your lungs is measured.

  2. The Machine Also Reads Other ChemicalsPeople who work around chemicals might also absorb these compounds, which may then show up in lung tissue. Such things as nitrous oxide, acetonitrile, ethylene, toluene, isopropanol, if found in the lung tissue of a DUI suspect, can give a falsely high reading on a breath test.

  3. Your Blood Alcohol Level Was Still RisingRemember that in the State of Washington, the law criminalizes driving with a .08 within two hours of driving. But alcohol can take up to 3 hours to absorb fully into the bloodstream. In some cases, a persons’ peak BAC may come at the station when taking the breath test, sometimes becoming twice as high as your level when you were stopped, especially if you consumed the alcohol shortly before the stop. In other words, when you were stopped your BAC level may have been .06 but an hour later at the police station when the alcohol has been fully absorbed, the test can read .12.

  4. DietA high protein, low carbohydrate diet, such as the Adkins diet can produce compounds called ketones, produced by the body during metabolism. After a person consumes carbohydrates, as in drinking alcohol, these ketone bodies in the blood are able to produce another form of alcohol, called isopropyl alcohol.

  5. Natural CausesMany people are simply not suitable candidates for breath alcohol testing due to physical conditions such as chronic lung problems (emphysema, asthma, bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary syndrome) or dental problems. However, these individuals are given the exact same breath alcohol test as everyone else.

I recently had a case in Seattle in which my client suffers from a severe GERD condition. After being stopped for a minor traffic violation, the officer smelled alcohol coming from the vehicle and requested he perform a series of field sobriety test (FST’s), then promptly placed him under arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI.) My client was able call me from the station and explain his medical circumstances. I instructed him to explain his condition to the officer, submit to a breath test but then immediately request a blood sample as well. My client’s breath test was above the legal limit. But to the police officer’s credit, he agreed to take my client immediately to a local hospital for a voluntary blood draw. The results? My clients’ alcohol level was well below the legal limit, according to the more accurate blood draw and the case was eventually dismissed.

Permalink to this entry

Field Sobriety Tests-What do they really tell you?

Posted Tuesday, October 23, 2012 by Andrew Charles Huff

Most of us are familiar with these roadside exercises called Field Sobriety Tests (FST’s) that police officers will administer to people who are suspected of driving under the influence (DUI). We usually envision a motorist pulled over and asked to stand on one foot or touch the end of their nose, always while traffic is whizzing by just feet away with a biased officer staring straight at them while shining a flashlight in their face. Not exactly the ideal conditions to perform roadside agility tests. Besides, what does walking a pretend tightrope have to do with driving a vehicle? The official answer is these tests supposedly measure ones balance and coordination, two traits needed to control a vehicle. There are scientific studies out there conducted for the purpose of showing these exercises are an accurate measure of these traits. But how are the “other factors” taken into consideration, such as nervousness, being cold, naturally poor balance or even that pesky ankle injury you keep tweaking while playing pick-up basketball? The answer? They’re not. Why? Police officers are not trained how to take such factors into consideration. These “one size fits all” exercises are given to everyone in the same proscribed manner regardless of a persons size, weight, balance issues, poor eyesight, bad leg, etc. Besides an eye test or Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN, police officers routinely use the Walk and Turn test and One Leg Stand test, two physical exercises conducted in a usually tough environment, alongside a road and usually at night. So why not simply ask a person to walk normally 10 steps, turn and walk back as they usually would. Then if a person had trouble doing that, well that would truly tell you something about whether or not they were impaired. But for now, get used to seeing a people standing on one leg and counting to 30 while trying not to notice oncoming headlights. And if you do see them, try not to honk.

Permalink to this entry

Contact Andrew Today…

47.6057080 -122.3302060